From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wright v. State

Court of Appeals of Iowa.
Apr 19, 2017
900 N.W.2d 617 (Iowa Ct. App. 2017)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

concluding jurors can reach different conclusions with regard to the means of committing the crime

Summary of this case from State v. Tovar
See 2 Summaries

Opinion

No. 16-0275

04-19-2017

James E. WRIGHT, Jr., Applicant-Appellee, v. STATE of Iowa, Respondent-Appellant.

Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Benjamin Parrott, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant State. Gary Dickey and Angela Campbell of Dickey & Campbell Law Firm, P.L.C., Des Moines, for appellee.

DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION

Reversed and Remanded.

Summaries of

Wright v. State

Court of Appeals of Iowa.
Apr 19, 2017
900 N.W.2d 617 (Iowa Ct. App. 2017)

concluding jurors can reach different conclusions with regard to the means of committing the crime

Summary of this case from State v. Tovar

noting a direct legal claim and indirect legal claim presented within an ineffective-assistance framework are substantively different

Summary of this case from State v. Treptow
Case details for

Wright v. State

Case Details

Full title:James E. WRIGHT, Jr., Applicant-Appellee, v. STATE of Iowa…

Court:Court of Appeals of Iowa.

Date published: Apr 19, 2017

Citations

900 N.W.2d 617 (Iowa Ct. App. 2017)

Citing Cases

State v. Treptow

A claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is more than an error preservation device; it is a substantive…

State v. Tovar

This instruction is a correct statement of the law. See State v. Bratthauer, 354 N.W.2d 774, 776 (Iowa 1984)…

2 Citing Cases