From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Worthington v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Feb 16, 1996
667 So. 2d 1023 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Summary

holding that the trial court's denial of a rule 3.800 motion must be reversed when no record portions were attached and that the state's attempt to provide the missing documentation by supplementing the record in the appellate proceedings did not cure the defect

Summary of this case from McBride v. State

Opinion

No. 95-2110.

February 16, 1996.

3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, R. James Stroker, Judge.

Derrick Worthington, Raiford, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Barbara Arlene Fink, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


Appellant seeks review of the summary denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion for jail time credit. The trial court failed to attach portions of the record to the appealed order demonstrating the defendant is entitled to no relief. Hall v. State. 659 So.2d 491 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). The state's attempt to provide such documentation to this court by supplemental record does not cure the defect. Smothers v. State, 555 So.2d 462 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); Saunders v. State, 661 So.2d 134 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995); Foley v. State, 657 So.2d 929 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995). We reverse and remand with instructions to the lower court either to attach copies of the pertinent record, or if necessary, to conduct a hearing.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

COBB and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Worthington v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Feb 16, 1996
667 So. 2d 1023 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

holding that the trial court's denial of a rule 3.800 motion must be reversed when no record portions were attached and that the state's attempt to provide the missing documentation by supplementing the record in the appellate proceedings did not cure the defect

Summary of this case from McBride v. State
Case details for

Worthington v. State

Case Details

Full title:Derrick WORTHINGTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Feb 16, 1996

Citations

667 So. 2d 1023 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Citing Cases

Webb v. State

However, the trial court did not attach the entire closing argument and the court's failure to do so cannot…

Vanderblomen v. State

Immediately following the decisions in Davis andCallaway, this court and the Second, Third, and Fifth…