From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 5, 2006
925 So. 2d 427 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Summary

denying motion for rehearing

Summary of this case from Williams v. State

Opinion

No. 3D05-2511.

April 5, 2006.

An Appeal under Fla.R.App.P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court of Miami-Dade County, Sarah I. Zabel, Judge.

Gary Lee Williams, in proper person.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, for appellee.

Before GREEN, RAMIREZ, and ROTHENBERG, JJ.


The motion for rehearing is hereby denied. We withdraw our December 21, 2005 opinion and substitute the following in its place.

Appellant Gary Lee Williams appeals the denial of his "Independent Action Under Extrinsic Fraud pursuant to RCP Rule 1.540(b)(3) and Fed. Rules Civ. Proc. Rule 60(b)(3)." As the Florida Supreme Court stated in Steinhorst v. State, 636 So.2d 498, 500 (Fla. 1994): "By its own terms, rule 1.540 applies only to civil causes, not to collateral claims associated with a criminal conviction." It appears that the circuit court therefore treated Williams' filing as a 3.850 motion and denied it as time-barred. We find no error.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Williams v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 5, 2006
925 So. 2d 427 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

denying motion for rehearing

Summary of this case from Williams v. State
Case details for

Williams v. State

Case Details

Full title:Gary Lee WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Apr 5, 2006

Citations

925 So. 2d 427 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Citing Cases

Young v. State

Affirmed. See Brown v. State, 827 So. 2d 1054 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Green v. State, 765 So. 2d 825 (Fla. 2d DCA…

Williams v. State

3d DCA 2012) (denying motion for rehearing); Williams v. State, 49 So.3d 255 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010) (table)…