From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Kastner

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Jan 30, 2015
No. CIV-13-1280-C (W.D. Okla. Jan. 30, 2015)

Summary

noting dismissal of habeas claims on mootness grounds should be without prejudice

Summary of this case from Mertins v. Maye

Opinion

No. CIV-13-1280-C

01-30-2015

JAMES LEE WILLIAMS II, Petitioner, v. PAUL A. KASTNER, Warden, Respondent


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court on the Supplemental Report and Recommendation entered by United States Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell on September 18, 2014. The court file reflects that Petitioner has not objected to the Report and Recommendation despite being granted several extensions of time in which to do so. Therefore, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety.

Accordingly, the Supplemental Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. No. 47) is adopted and the petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied with respect to the claims involving Incident Report 2502346, and dismissed without prejudice to the claims involving Incident Report 2507669. A judgment will enter.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 30th day of January, 2015.

/s/_________

ROBIN J. CAUTHRON

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Williams v. Kastner

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Jan 30, 2015
No. CIV-13-1280-C (W.D. Okla. Jan. 30, 2015)

noting dismissal of habeas claims on mootness grounds should be without prejudice

Summary of this case from Mertins v. Maye
Case details for

Williams v. Kastner

Case Details

Full title:JAMES LEE WILLIAMS II, Petitioner, v. PAUL A. KASTNER, Warden, Respondent

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Date published: Jan 30, 2015

Citations

No. CIV-13-1280-C (W.D. Okla. Jan. 30, 2015)

Citing Cases

Mertins v. Maye

The court concludes that Mr. Mertins' claims in his petition of due process deprivations at his first…