From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Willett v. Lincolnshire Mgmt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 20, 2003
302 A.D.2d 271 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Summary

affirming dismissal of setoff affirmative defense where obligation was currently being disputed

Summary of this case from Feltman v. Noor Staffing Grp., LLC (In re Corporate Res. Servs., Inc.)

Opinion

222, 223

February 20, 2003.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Herman Cahn, J.), entered July 10, 2001, which, to the extent appealed from, granted plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on his conversion cause of action and dismissed defendants' first, third, sixth and seventh affirmative defenses, and judgment, same court and Justice, entered April 23, 2002, which awarded plaintiff $881,037 plus interest, unanimously affirmed, with one bill of costs.

ANDREW H. BART, for Plaintiff-Respondent.

DANIEL F. SCHIFF, for Defendants-Appellants.

Before: Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Ellerin, Williams, Marlow, JJ.


The IAS court properly granted plaintiff summary judgment on his conversion claim against defendant Lincolnshire Management, Inc. (LMI). It is undisputed that LMI, in its role of managing agent of defendant Lincolnshire Equity Fund, L.P. (The Fund), withheld substantial distributions owed to plaintiff by The Fund. LMI's affirmative defense, that it properly withheld the distributions due plaintiff to offset a substantial obligation owed from plaintiff to LMI, was properly dismissed. The obligation purportedly owing from plaintiff to LMI is currently being disputed and "there is no right to set off a possible, unliquidated liability against a liquidated claim that is due and payable" (Spodek v. Park Prop. Dev. Assocs., 263 A.D.2d 478, 478-479; see also New Haven Props. Ltd. v. Grinberg, 293 A.D.2d 386). The IAS court also properly dismissed the affirmative defenses that LMI's actions were justified in the interests of equity and that plaintiff's conversion claim was barred by the doctrines of estoppel and unclean hands since there was no evidence of wrongdoing by plaintiff.

We have considered defendants' remaining contentions and find them unavailing.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Willett v. Lincolnshire Mgmt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 20, 2003
302 A.D.2d 271 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

affirming dismissal of setoff affirmative defense where obligation was currently being disputed

Summary of this case from Feltman v. Noor Staffing Grp., LLC (In re Corporate Res. Servs., Inc.)
Case details for

Willett v. Lincolnshire Mgmt

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD H. WILLETT, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. LINCOLNSHIRE MANAGEMENT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 20, 2003

Citations

302 A.D.2d 271 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
756 N.Y.S.2d 9

Citing Cases

Wallace v. Merrill Lynch Capital Servs., Inc.

A debt owed to another can be set-off by an obligation to the debtor only if both the debt and the…

U.S. v. Peterson

, In re Clark Retail Enterprises, Inc., 308 B.R. 869, 895 (Bankr.N.D.Ill. 2004); In re Allen-Main Associates,…