Summary
treating case as involving a petition for writ of certiorari because the alleged harm, a nonfinal order "requiring the wife to undergo a psychological evaluation . . . . will not be remediable on appeal"
Summary of this case from Olges v. DoughertyOpinion
No. 96-00896.
September 25, 1996.
Appeal from nonfinal order of the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Florence Foster, Judge.
Donald R. Gillette, Tampa, for Appellant.
Nina M. Hanson and Catherine W. Real of Muga Real, P.A., Tampa, for Appellee.
The order in this case, requiring the wife to undergo a psychological evaluation, is not an appealable nonfinal order. See Pariser v. Pariser, 601 So.2d 291 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). Because the alleged harm will not be remediable on appeal, we treat the instant case as a petition for writ of certiorari. Pariser. We conclude that the trial court did not depart from the essential requirements of law; therefore, we deny the writ. See Elder v. Carter, 670 So.2d 1032 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).
PARKER, A.C.J., and LAZZARA and QUINCE, JJ., concur.