upholding district court because "the occurrences [defendant] identifies amount to merely speculative opportunities for taint to occur, and `[t]he Government is not required to negate all abstract `possibility' of taint.'"
Summary of this case from U.S. v. BlowersNo. 95-1225.
March 5, 1996.
S.D.W.Va., 872 F.Supp. 1509.
AFFIRMED
upholding district court because "the occurrences [defendant] identifies amount to merely speculative opportunities for taint to occur, and `[t]he Government is not required to negate all abstract `possibility' of taint.'"
Summary of this case from U.S. v. BlowersFull title:Vienna Family Medical Associates, Inc. v. Allstate Ins. Co
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Date published: Mar 5, 1996
However, the Court, in accordance with the progeny of Massaro and the opinion itself, declines to hold that…
Walker v. United StatesEven assuming this Court has such categorical discretion, the Court would decline to exercise it here because…