From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vernon v. Vernon

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 16, 1942
41 N.E.2d 792 (N.Y. 1942)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

In Vernon v. Vernon (288 N.Y. 503) it appeared that, while duress had been charged in the complaint, the trial court made no finding to that effect, and the Appellate Division, Third Department, found that there was no evidence to support that charge (see Vernon v. Vernon, 262 App. Div. 431, 433).

Summary of this case from Averbuck v. Averbuck
See 1 Summary

Opinion

Argued March 6, 1942

Decided April 16, 1942

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, BREWSTER, J.

Thomas F. Croake for appellant.

William Logan, Jr., and Helen F. Tuohy for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: LEHMAN, Ch. J., LOUGHRAN, FINCH, LEWIS and DESMOND, JJ. Taking no part: RIPPEY and CONWAY, JJ.

Summaries of

Vernon v. Vernon

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 16, 1942
41 N.E.2d 792 (N.Y. 1942)

In Vernon v. Vernon (288 N.Y. 503) it appeared that, while duress had been charged in the complaint, the trial court made no finding to that effect, and the Appellate Division, Third Department, found that there was no evidence to support that charge (see Vernon v. Vernon, 262 App. Div. 431, 433).

Summary of this case from Averbuck v. Averbuck
Case details for

Vernon v. Vernon

Case Details

Full title:EUGENE H. VERNON, Appellant, v. CAROLYN T. VERNON, Respondent

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 16, 1942

Citations

41 N.E.2d 792 (N.Y. 1942)
41 N.E.2d 792

Citing Cases

Averbuck v. Averbuck

We hold that appellant's contention in this regard is correct, that as her complaint is sufficient prima…

Verbeck v. Verbeck

( Pearson v. Pearson, 230 N.Y. 141.) "It is no part of the public policy of this State to refuse recognition…

8 Citing Cases