From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Williams

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jan 15, 1997
107 F.3d 869 (4th Cir. 1997)

Summary

remanding for district court determination whether 2255 motion timely filed under Houston

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Dorsey

Opinion

No. 96-6878

January 15, 1997.


On Petition for Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing In Banc.

Haywood Williams, Jr. petitions this court for rehearing of his earlier appeal. We grant the petition for rehearing, deny the suggestion for rehearing in banc, and vacate and remand the district court's decision. The district court is directed to determine whether Williams' motion to reinstate a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Act of Apr. 24, 1996, 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Law. Co-op. Advance Sheet June 1996), was filed prior to the enactment of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act under Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988).

Entered at the direction of Judge Luttig. Judge Ervin and Judge Michael concur in granting the petition for rehearing. Judge Luttig dissents and would deny the petition for rehearing.

FOR THE COURT,

Patricia S. Connor, CLERK


Summaries of

U.S. v. Williams

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jan 15, 1997
107 F.3d 869 (4th Cir. 1997)

remanding for district court determination whether 2255 motion timely filed under Houston

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Dorsey
Case details for

U.S. v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. HAYWOOD WILLIAMS, JR.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jan 15, 1997

Citations

107 F.3d 869 (4th Cir. 1997)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Dorsey

See Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 270-76, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 2381-85, 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988) (holding that a…

Anderson v. Lowcountry Urology Clinics, PA

Because Plaintiff has failed to meet her evidentiary burden of demonstrating intentional discriminatory pay…