From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Stringer

United States District Court, W.D. Missouri, Southwestern Division
Aug 30, 2011
Case No. 10-5038-01-CR-SW-GAF (W.D. Mo. Aug. 30, 2011)

Summary

applying exception but characterizing law as “unsettled”

Summary of this case from State v. Lundquist

Opinion

Case No. 10-5038-01-CR-SW-GAF.

August 30, 2011


ORDER


Now pending before the Court is Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence (Doc. #23-1). Defendant seeks to suppress all evidence seized s a result of a traffic stop by the Missouri State Highway Patrol on June 14, 2010, as well as any derivative evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant executed at his residence on June 15, 2010, as well as any custodial statements made after his arrest on June 14, 2010.

United States Magistrate Judge James C. England conducted an evidentiary hearing on June 8, 2011, and issued his Report and Recommendation (Doc. #34) on July 20, 2011. Defendant filed his Exceptions to the Report and Recommendation (Doc. #39) on August 29, 2011.

Upon careful and independent review of the pending motion, defendant's objections to the Magistrate's Report and Recommendation, as well as the applicable law, this Court hereby adopts and incorporates as its own Opinion and Order the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate James C. England.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Suppress (Doc. #23-1) is OVERRULED and DENIED.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Stringer

United States District Court, W.D. Missouri, Southwestern Division
Aug 30, 2011
Case No. 10-5038-01-CR-SW-GAF (W.D. Mo. Aug. 30, 2011)

applying exception but characterizing law as “unsettled”

Summary of this case from State v. Lundquist
Case details for

U.S. v. Stringer

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. TIMOTHY C. STRINGER, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Missouri, Southwestern Division

Date published: Aug 30, 2011

Citations

Case No. 10-5038-01-CR-SW-GAF (W.D. Mo. Aug. 30, 2011)

Citing Cases

United States v. Clinton

The weight of authority from the District Courts, however, holds cell phones maybe searched incident to…

State v. Lundquist

On the facts, we are not called upon to decide if government agents would have to obtain a warrant to search…