In United States v. Patton, 9 F.3d 110, 1993 WL 432838 (6th Cir. Oct. 26, 1993) (unpublished table op.), we similarly considered whether § 3C1.2 could be applied to co-conspirators who did not personally cause the substantial risk of harm to another.
Summary of this case from United States v. Rich93-5011.
October 19, 1993.
Appeal from E.D.Ky.
AFFIRMED AND REMANDED.
In United States v. Patton, 9 F.3d 110, 1993 WL 432838 (6th Cir. Oct. 26, 1993) (unpublished table op.), we similarly considered whether § 3C1.2 could be applied to co-conspirators who did not personally cause the substantial risk of harm to another.
Summary of this case from United States v. RichIn United States v. Patton, 9 F.3d 110, 1993 WL 432838 (6th Cir. Oct. 26, 1993) (unpublished table op.), we similarly considered whether § 3C1.2 could be applied to co-conspirators who did not personally cause the substantial risk of harm to another.
Summary of this case from United States v. RichIn United States v. Niece, 9 F.3d 110 (Table), 1993 WL 424960 at *9 (6th Cir. 1993), this Court upheld a § 3A1.1 enhancement based upon the defendant's "father figure" relationship to the victim.
Summary of this case from U.S. v. Gawthropdrawing the same conclusion under the Guidelines, § 4B1.1
Summary of this case from United States v. McClendonIn United States v. Little, 9 F.3d 110, 1993 WL 453396 (6th Cir. 1993) (per curiam), the Sixth Circuit addressed whether statements substantially the same as those at issue in this case rendered the defendant's confession involuntary.
Summary of this case from U.S. v. AlvarezFull title:U.S. v. NIECE
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Date published: Oct 19, 1993
This court recently affirmed each of the co-defendant's convictions. See United States v. Bray, 9 F.3d 110…
U.S. v. AlvarezSchneckloth v. Busta monte, 412 U.S. 218, 227, 93 S.Ct. 2041, 2048, 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973). In United States…