Summary
declining to reach defendant's argument that trial court failed to grant a Franks hearing where the argument was never raised before the district court
Summary of this case from State v. FullerOpinion
Editorial Note:
This opinion appears in the Federal reporter in a table titled "Table of Decisions Without Reported Opinions". (See FI CTA9 Rule 36-3 regarding use of unpublished opinions)
Decided May 3, 1989.
D.Nev.
AFFIRMED.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Nevada (Las Vegas) District Howard D. McKibben, District Judge, Presiding
Before POOLE, REINHARDT and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges.
The panel finds this case appropriate for submission without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a) and Ninth Circuit Rule 34-4.
We agree with the district court that appellant's motion to join in her codefendants' motions to suppress was properly denied for lack of standing. In any event, we note that the codefendants' motions were ultimately denied.
Counsel's request for compensation in excess of the statutory limit is denied.
AFFIRMED.
FN** This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.