From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Arndt

United States District Court, W.D. Missouri, Western Division
Jan 28, 2010
Case No. 09-00043-01-CR-W-GAF (W.D. Mo. Jan. 28, 2010)

Summary

adopting report and recommendation

Summary of this case from United States v. Fife

Opinion

Case No. 09-00043-01-CR-W-GAF.

January 28, 2010


ORDER


Now pending before the Court is Defendant's Motion to Suppress (Doc. #16). On May 29, 2009, United States Magistrate Judge John T. Maughmer conducted an evidentiary hearing on Defendant's motion. On January 1, 2010, Judge Maughmer issued his Report and Recommendation (Doc. #40). On January 12, 2010, Defendant's Motion to Reconsider Court's Report and Recommendation was filed (Doc. #43).

Upon careful and independent review of the pending motion and suggestions in support thereof, defendant's objections to the Magistrate's Report and Recommendation, as well as the applicable law, this Court hereby adopts and incorporates as its own Opinion and Order the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge John T. Maughmer.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Suppress (Doc. #16) is OVERRULED and DENIED.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Arndt

United States District Court, W.D. Missouri, Western Division
Jan 28, 2010
Case No. 09-00043-01-CR-W-GAF (W.D. Mo. Jan. 28, 2010)

adopting report and recommendation

Summary of this case from United States v. Fife

adopting report and recommendation

Summary of this case from United States v. Fife
Case details for

U.S. v. Arndt

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ELVON L. ARNDT, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Missouri, Western Division

Date published: Jan 28, 2010

Citations

Case No. 09-00043-01-CR-W-GAF (W.D. Mo. Jan. 28, 2010)

Citing Cases

United States v. Fife

Here, the outcome would likely be different if the incriminating nature or evidentiary value of the seized…

United States v. Fife

Here, the outcome would likely be different if the incriminating nature or evidentiary value of the seized…