From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Whitney

United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit
Jun 4, 2012
468 F. App'x 637 (7th Cir. 2012)

Summary

upholding "on any ground" appellate waiver

Summary of this case from Price v. United States

Opinion

No. 12-1012

06-04-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DAVID T. WHITNEY, Defendant-Appellant.


NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1


Before


RICHARD D. CUDAHY, Circuit Judge


JOEL M. FLAUM, Circuit Judge


JOHN DANIEL TINDER, Circuit Judge


Appeal from the United States District

Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Terre Haute Division.


No. 2:11CR00020-001


William T. Lawrence, Judge


ORDER

David Whitney, an inmate at the federal prison in Terry Haute, Indiana, was caught carrying a shank and charged with possession of a prohibited object, 18 U.S.C. § 1791(a)(2). He pleaded guilty after the parties had stipulated to a total offense level of 11. The government promised to recommend a prison sentence at or below the middle of the range applicable to that offense level, and in exchange Whitney waived the right to appeal his conviction or sentence "on any ground" if the district court accepted the parties' stipulation. The court did so and sentenced Whitney to 24 months' imprisonment, the bottom of the resulting guidelines range. Whitney filed a notice of appeal despite his waiver, but appointed counsel has concluded that the appeal is frivolous and moves to withdraw. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Whitney has not responded to counsel's submission. See CIR. R. 51(b).

As his lawyer acknowledges, Whitney's broad waiver of his right to appeal makes this case frivolous. Whitey has told counsel that he does not want to challenge his guilty plea, and thus the lawyer properly omits from his Anders brief any discussion about the plea colloquy or the voluntariness of Whitney's guilty plea. See United States v. Knox, 287 F.3d 667, 670-72 (7th Cir. 2002). And since an appeal waiver stands or falls with the guilty plea, United States v. Sakellarion, 649 F.3d 634, 638-39 (7th Cir. 2011); United States v. Cole, 569 F.3d 774, 776 (7th Cir. 2009), Whitney's appeal waiver must be enforced.

The motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the appeal is DISMISSED.


Summaries of

United States v. Whitney

United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit
Jun 4, 2012
468 F. App'x 637 (7th Cir. 2012)

upholding "on any ground" appellate waiver

Summary of this case from Price v. United States

upholding "on any ground" appellate waiver

Summary of this case from Fulmer v. United States

upholding “on any ground” appellate waiver

Summary of this case from McClendon v. United States
Case details for

United States v. Whitney

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DAVID T. WHITNEY…

Court:United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit

Date published: Jun 4, 2012

Citations

468 F. App'x 637 (7th Cir. 2012)

Citing Cases

Price v. United States

Of course, that's just "pure applesauce," King v. Burwell, ___ U.S. ___, 135 S. Ct. 2480, 2501 (2015)…

McCullough v. United States

Because it didn't, his logic goes, McCullough is now free to cite any one them (e.g, the improper "manner" in…