From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Rollins

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
Sep 1, 2015
800 F.3d 859 (7th Cir. 2015)

Summary

stating “we do not address Johnson's effect on the career-offender guideline; that question remains open in this circuit.”

Summary of this case from United States v. Cornejo-Lopez

Opinion

No. 13–1731.

2015-09-1

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Darryl ROLLINS, Defendant–Appellant.


Editor's Note: The opinion of the United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit, in U.S. v. Rollins, published in the advance sheet at this citation, 800 F.3d 859, was withdrawn from the bound volume because the decision was vacated by the Court on October 6, 2015.


Summaries of

United States v. Rollins

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
Sep 1, 2015
800 F.3d 859 (7th Cir. 2015)

stating “we do not address Johnson's effect on the career-offender guideline; that question remains open in this circuit.”

Summary of this case from United States v. Cornejo-Lopez
Case details for

United States v. Rollins

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Darryl ROLLINS…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Date published: Sep 1, 2015

Citations

800 F.3d 859 (7th Cir. 2015)

Citing Cases

United States v. Madrid

It is worth noting that other circuits have recognized that Johnson calls into question whether the…

United States v. Litzy

Some have held that Johnson does not abrogate the residual clause of § 4B1.2(a)(2). SeeUnited States v.…