From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Missouri

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Feb 13, 2012
464 F. App'x 128 (4th Cir. 2012)

Summary

dismissing appeal as moot when the prisoner was "released from federal custody, his sentence did not include a term of supervised release, and there are no continuing collateral consequences from the district court's amended judgment on revocation of supervised release"

Summary of this case from McArthur v. United States

Opinion

No. 11-6984

02-13-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. VINCENT MISSOURI, Defendant - Appellant.

Vincent Missouri, Appellant Pro Se. Deborah Brereton Barbier, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina; David Calhoun Stephens, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (6:00-cr-00498-MBS-1)

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Vincent Missouri, Appellant Pro Se. Deborah Brereton Barbier, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina; David Calhoun Stephens, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Vincent Missouri seeks to appeal the district court's amended criminal judgment reimposing a thirty-six-month sentence of imprisonment following revocation of his term of supervised release for an underlying bank robbery conviction. Because Missouri has been released from federal custody, his sentence did not include a term of supervised release, and there are no continuing collateral consequences from the district court's amended judgment on revocation of supervised release, we deny Missouri's motion to have his sentence expire immediately and dismiss the appeal as moot. See Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 12-18 (1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED


Summaries of

United States v. Missouri

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Feb 13, 2012
464 F. App'x 128 (4th Cir. 2012)

dismissing appeal as moot when the prisoner was "released from federal custody, his sentence did not include a term of supervised release, and there are no continuing collateral consequences from the district court's amended judgment on revocation of supervised release"

Summary of this case from McArthur v. United States
Case details for

United States v. Missouri

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. VINCENT MISSOURI…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Feb 13, 2012

Citations

464 F. App'x 128 (4th Cir. 2012)

Citing Cases

McArthur v. United States

Hypothetically, McArthur would have to be convicted of another federal crime for which he was sentenced to…