From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Kolodesh

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Apr 5, 2012
CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 11-464 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 5, 2012)

Summary

finding that counsel must be disqualified based on conflict of interest that arose because counsel was implicated in the client's crime

Summary of this case from United States v. Kiley

Opinion

CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 11-464

04-05-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MATTHEW KOLODESH, Defendant.


ORDER

AND NOW, on this 5th day of April, 2011, upon consideration of the Government's Motion to Disqualify Mark B. Sheppard, Esq. (ECF No. 27), Defendant Kolodesh's Response to the Government's Motion (ECF No. 33), and a hearing on the record (ECF No. 37), it is hereby ORDERED that the Government's Motion to Disqualify Mr. Sheppard is GRANTED.

Jack J. McMahon, Esq. entered his appearance on behalf of Defendant Kolodesh on February 9, 2012 and avers that he is familiar with the legal and factual circumstances of this case. Mr. McMahon shall continue to serve as Defendant's trial counsel.

It is further OREDERED that, as the Court previously suspended the Government's deadline to respond to Defendant's motions challenging the indictment, seeking suppression of evidence, or raising any dispositive matters (ECF No. 32), the Government shall have until April 19, 2012, to respond to Defendant's motions.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________

EDUARDO C. ROBRENO , J.


Summaries of

United States v. Kolodesh

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Apr 5, 2012
CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 11-464 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 5, 2012)

finding that counsel must be disqualified based on conflict of interest that arose because counsel was implicated in the client's crime

Summary of this case from United States v. Kiley
Case details for

United States v. Kolodesh

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MATTHEW KOLODESH, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Apr 5, 2012

Citations

CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 11-464 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 5, 2012)

Citing Cases

United States v. Lacerda

The primary purpose of this constitutional right is “to grant a criminal defendant control over the conduct…

United States v. Vega

In considering whether an actual or potential conflict exists, "the Court is . . . guided by an additional…