From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Hargrave

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Mar 27, 2015
CRIMINAL NO. 6:10-0164 (W.D. La. Mar. 27, 2015)

Summary

rejecting a similar claim of ineffective assistance of counsel

Summary of this case from Gene Mitchell Olivier La. Doc v. Prince

Opinion

CRIMINAL NO. 6:10-0164 CIVIL NO. 6:13-0929

03-27-2015

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ALLISON HARGRAVE


MAGISTRATE JUDGE HILL

JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, and after an independent review of the record including the objections filed by the petitioner, and having determined that the findings and recommendation are correct under the applicable law;

IT IS ORDERED that Allison Hargrave's Motion to Vacate filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 [rec. doc. 124] is DENIED AND DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

THUS DONE AND SIGNED, in chambers, in ___, Louisiana, on this 27th day of March, 2015

/s/_________

RICHARD T. HAIK, SR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Hargrave

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Mar 27, 2015
CRIMINAL NO. 6:10-0164 (W.D. La. Mar. 27, 2015)

rejecting a similar claim of ineffective assistance of counsel

Summary of this case from Gene Mitchell Olivier La. Doc v. Prince

rejecting a similar claim of ineffective assistance of counsel

Summary of this case from United States v. Smith
Case details for

United States v. Hargrave

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ALLISON HARGRAVE

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Mar 27, 2015

Citations

CRIMINAL NO. 6:10-0164 (W.D. La. Mar. 27, 2015)

Citing Cases

United States v. Smith

[rec. docs. 108-1 and 108]. Because Smith knew the maximum possible sentence to which he might have been…

Gene Mitchell Olivier La. Doc v. Prince

Because petitioner knew the maximum possible sentence to which he might have been subjected and his actual…