Summary
In Johnson, the court pointed out that the trial court, in its opinion denying a new trial, had stated that there were perhaps only three known train wreckers in the United States. United States ex rel. Johnson v. Rundle, 243 F. Supp. 695, 699 (E.D. Pa.), aff'd on opinion below, 349 F.2d 416 (3d Cir. 1965).
Summary of this case from Com. ex Rel. Marino v. MyersOpinion
No. 15136.
Argued March 5, 1965.
Decided May 28, 1965.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; A. Leon Higginbotham, Jr., Judge.
Richard A. Devlin, Asst. Dist. Atty., Montgomery County, Norristown, Pa. (Richard S. Lowe, Dist. Atty., Montgomery County, Norristown, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.
Daniel L. Quinlan, Jr., Quinlan, Torak DeYoung, Norristown, Pa., H. Lester Haws, Ardmore, Pa., for appellee.
Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and FORMAN and FREEDMAN, Circuit Judges.
The court below made an exhaustive review of the operative facts in this case and carefully examined the pertinent authorities. We perceive no error in the proceedings and we will therefore affirm the judgment on the able opinion of Judge Higginbotham, 243 F. Supp. 695 (E.D.Pa. 1964).