Summary
requiring prisoner to remove his religious head covering on one occasion was not a substantial burden on his religious practice
Summary of this case from Vincent v. StewartOpinion
ORDER (1) ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND (2) GRANTING DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS/ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DISMISSING THE COMPLAINT
/b>
JAMES V. SELNA, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint and all other papers along with the attached Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and has made a de novo determination of the Report and Recommendation.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that a Judgment be entered (1) approving and adopting the Report and Recommendation, (2) granting Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings/Motion for Summary Judgment; and (3) dismissing Plaintiff's Complaint and the action with prejudice.