From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tynan v. City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 26, 1918
119 N.E. 1082 (N.Y. 1918)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

In Tynan v. City of New York (223 N.Y. 596) the notice gave the place of accident as the northeast corner of Flushing avenue and Garden street and complained of the condition of crosswalk, pavement or sidewalk.

Summary of this case from Sweeney v. City of New York
See 1 Summary

Opinion

Argued March 11, 1918

Decided March 26, 1918

Theodore H. Lord and Arthur K. Wing for appellant.

William P. Burr, Corporation Counsel ( William B. Carswell of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., CHASE, HOGAN, POUND, McLAUGHLIN and ANDREWS, JJ. Dissenting: CARDOZO, J.

Summaries of

Tynan v. City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 26, 1918
119 N.E. 1082 (N.Y. 1918)

In Tynan v. City of New York (223 N.Y. 596) the notice gave the place of accident as the northeast corner of Flushing avenue and Garden street and complained of the condition of crosswalk, pavement or sidewalk.

Summary of this case from Sweeney v. City of New York
Case details for

Tynan v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:ROSE E. TYNAN, Appellant, v . CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 26, 1918

Citations

119 N.E. 1082 (N.Y. 1918)
119 N.E. 1082

Citing Cases

Sweeney v. City of New York

We held that this made the notice invalid. In Tynan v. City of New York ( 223 N.Y. 596) the notice gave the…

Van Den Bergh v. City of New York

In Weisman v. City of New York ( supra, 182) the court said: "Under all of these circumstances the law is…

3 Citing Cases