From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Toll v. Toll

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Aug 13, 1982
448 A.2d 1379 (Pa. 1982)

Summary

In Toll, supra, the Superior Court addressed this same issue and correctly analyzed its jurisdiction to consider an interlocutory appeal from an order which the trial court refused to certify.

Summary of this case from Com. v. Boyle

Opinion

August 13, 1982.

Petition No. 17 E.D. Allocatur Docket, 1982 for Allowance of Appeal from the Superior Court, (Nos. 1962 and 1963 Philadelphia 1980).

Albert Momjian, Philadelphia, for petitioner.

Parker H. Wilson, Norristown, for respondent.

Before O'BRIEN, C. J., and ROBERTS, NIX, LARSEN, FLAHERTY, McDERMOTT and HUTCHINSON, JJ.


ORDER


Petition for Allowance of Appeal granted. Order of the Superior Court affirmed. 293 Pa. Super. 549, 439 A.2d 712 (1981).


Summaries of

Toll v. Toll

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Aug 13, 1982
448 A.2d 1379 (Pa. 1982)

In Toll, supra, the Superior Court addressed this same issue and correctly analyzed its jurisdiction to consider an interlocutory appeal from an order which the trial court refused to certify.

Summary of this case from Com. v. Boyle
Case details for

Toll v. Toll

Case Details

Full title:Robert E. TOLL, Appellant, v. Norma TOLL

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Aug 13, 1982

Citations

448 A.2d 1379 (Pa. 1982)
498 Pa. 536

Citing Cases

Pa. Dept. of Labor v. Pa. Hum. Rel. Com

We note that HRC's refusal to certify this interlocutory appeal is in no way fatal to the instant appeal. The…

Com. v. Boyle

However, where the trial court refuses to certify an interlocutory order, the accepted procedure for…