From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. Mikell

United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Statesboro Division
May 22, 2008
CIVIL ACTION NO. 608-012 (S.D. Ga. May. 22, 2008)

Summary

dismissing a claim because the plaintiff failed to allege facts to support subjective deliberate indifference, as "he simply reported suffering 'chest pains' but d[id] not allege that he was wheezing, coughing, laboring for breath, or manifesting other obvious breathing problems in the defendants' presence."

Summary of this case from Williams v. Glover

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 608-012.

May 22, 2008


ORDER


After a careful de novo review of the record in this case, the Court concurs with the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, to which no objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Thomas v. Mikell

United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Statesboro Division
May 22, 2008
CIVIL ACTION NO. 608-012 (S.D. Ga. May. 22, 2008)

dismissing a claim because the plaintiff failed to allege facts to support subjective deliberate indifference, as "he simply reported suffering 'chest pains' but d[id] not allege that he was wheezing, coughing, laboring for breath, or manifesting other obvious breathing problems in the defendants' presence."

Summary of this case from Williams v. Glover
Case details for

Thomas v. Mikell

Case Details

Full title:JABARI ANTONIO THOMAS v. OFFICER MIKELL and OFFICER DELOACH

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Statesboro Division

Date published: May 22, 2008

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 608-012 (S.D. Ga. May. 22, 2008)

Citing Cases

Williams v. Glover

Exhibiting those symptoms would show a manifestation of the need for treatment. Cf. Thomas v. Mikell, No.…

Nettles v. Edgar

See Report and Recommendation at 7, ECF No. 92, PageID.690 (“As one court, has observed, ‘[i]t is common…