From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

The Florida Bar v. Shapiro

Supreme Court of Florida
Oct 17, 2005
914 So. 2d 956 (Fla. 2005)

Summary

In Shapiro, the order suspending the attorney provided that he would remain ineligible to apply for reinstatement in Florida until he had attained reinstatement in New York. The attorney's professed intention of not returning to practice in the state in which the misconduct and discipline occurred (i.e., New York) was irrelevant to the requirement that he first attain reinstatement in that foreign jurisdiction before applying for reinstatement in Florida.

Summary of this case from Florida Bd. of Bar Exam. Re: Webster

Opinion

Case No. SC04-1276.

October 17, 2005.

Lower Tribunal No. 2004-51,528(17H).


After reviewing the report of the referee and considering the briefs, the referee's recommendation is approved. Respondent is suspended from the practice of law for one (1) year, effective, nunc pro tunc, May 6, 2005. Respondent shall comply with all terms and conditions set forth in the report. Further, the Respondent shall not be subject to reinstatement until he is reinstated by the State of New York.

Judgment is entered for The Florida Bar, 651 East Jefferson Street, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2300, for recovery of costs from James J. Shapiro in the amount of $1,282.25, for which sum let execution issue.

Not final until time expires to file motion for rehearing, and if filed, determined. The filing of a motion for rehearing shall not alter the effective date of this suspension.

PARIENTE, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO and BELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

The Florida Bar v. Shapiro

Supreme Court of Florida
Oct 17, 2005
914 So. 2d 956 (Fla. 2005)

In Shapiro, the order suspending the attorney provided that he would remain ineligible to apply for reinstatement in Florida until he had attained reinstatement in New York. The attorney's professed intention of not returning to practice in the state in which the misconduct and discipline occurred (i.e., New York) was irrelevant to the requirement that he first attain reinstatement in that foreign jurisdiction before applying for reinstatement in Florida.

Summary of this case from Florida Bd. of Bar Exam. Re: Webster

In Shapiro, the order suspending the attorney provided that he would remain ineligible to apply for reinstatement in Florida until he had attained reinstatement in New York. The attorney's professed intention of not returning to practice in the state in which the misconduct and discipline occurred (i.e., New York) was irrelevant to the requirement that he first attain reinstatement in that foreign jurisdiction before applying for reinstatement in Florida.

Summary of this case from Florida Board of Bar Examiners re Webster, SC08-296
Case details for

The Florida Bar v. Shapiro

Case Details

Full title:THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant v. JAMES J. SHAPIRO, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Oct 17, 2005

Citations

914 So. 2d 956 (Fla. 2005)

Citing Cases

Florida Board of Bar Examiners re Webster, SC08-296

Once more, we reject this contention with regard to the meaning of "home state" as applied to attorney…

Florida Bd. of Bar Exam. Re: Webster

Once more, we reject this contention with regard to the meaning of "home state" as applied to attorney…