From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Teledyne Industries, Inc. v. Podell

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Dec 6, 1976
546 F.2d 495 (2d Cir. 1976)

Summary

applying California law

Summary of this case from Holt v. Kormann

Opinion

Nos. 504, 505, Dockets 75-7518, 75-7679.

Argued November 18, 1976.

Decided December 6, 1976.

C. MacNeil Mitchell, New York City (Breed, Abbott Morgan, New York City, Stephen R. Lang, George F. Vary, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff-appellee.

Robert R. MacDonnell, New York City (Trubin Sillcocks Edelman Knapp, New York City), for defendants-appellants.

Appeal from the District Court for the Southern District of New York.

Before WATERMAN, FRIENDLY and MULLIGAN, Circuit Judges.


On this appeal from a judgment against the defendants-appellants for money damages, we affirm on the opinion of Hon. Whitman Knapp, United States District Court Judge, Southern District of New York, reported at 401 F.Supp. 729 (S.D.N.Y. 1975). The appellants also appeal from Judge Knapp's order denying a new trial on the alleged ground of newly discovered evidence. The order is affirmed as we find that appeal to be totally without merit and frivolous. Therefore, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1912 and Fed.R.App.P. 38, we assess the appellants double costs and, in addition, $1,500 in attorneys' fees.

See also Judge Bauman's opinion on a motion for summary judgment in this case, 373 F.Supp. 191 (S.D.N.Y. 1974).


Summaries of

Teledyne Industries, Inc. v. Podell

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Dec 6, 1976
546 F.2d 495 (2d Cir. 1976)

applying California law

Summary of this case from Holt v. Kormann

applying California law

Summary of this case from Bowling v. Ansted Chrysler-Plymouth-Dodge
Case details for

Teledyne Industries, Inc. v. Podell

Case Details

Full title:TELEDYNE INDUSTRIES, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. ODIF PODELL ET AL.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Dec 6, 1976

Citations

546 F.2d 495 (2d Cir. 1976)

Citing Cases

Vuitch v. Furr

Her responsibilities and activities were probative of her knowing participation in the activities of the…

Roach v. First Nat. Bank of Anchorage

Sections 11(a) and 314 provided for stays of proceedings "to prevent interference with, or diminution of, the…