In Taylor, the appellant claimed that his counsel was ineffective because they failed to challenge the constitutionality of the Statute Revision Commission.
Summary of this case from Wrobel v. HardestyNo. 79218
09-18-2020
Donald TAYLOR, Appellant, v. The STATE of Nevada, Respondent.
Gaffney Law Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney
AFFIRMED.
In Taylor, the appellant claimed that his counsel was ineffective because they failed to challenge the constitutionality of the Statute Revision Commission.
Summary of this case from Wrobel v. HardestyIn Taylor, the appellant claimed that his counsel was ineffective because they failed to challenge the constitutionality of the Statute Revision Commission.
Summary of this case from Perez-Marquez v. LumbardoIn Taylor, the appellant claimed that his counsel was ineffective because they failed to challenge the constitutionality of the Statute Revision Commission.
Summary of this case from Downing v. FordIn Taylor, the appellant claimed that his counsel was ineffective because they failed to challenge the constitutionality of the Statute Revision Commission.
Summary of this case from Brant v. NevadaIn Taylor, the appellant claimed that his counsel was ineffective because they failed to challenge the constitutionality of the Statute Revision Commission.
Summary of this case from Anderson v. NevadaIn Taylor, the appellant claimed that his counsel was ineffective because they failed to challenge the constitutionality of the Statute Revision Commission.
Summary of this case from Beard v. NevadaIn Taylor, the appellant claimed that his counsel was ineffective because they failed to challenge the constitutionality of the Statute Revision Commission.
Summary of this case from Jones v. StateIn Taylor, the court held that the Justices sitting on the Commission did not violate a constitutional provision because “the Legislative Counsel Bureau - which succeeded the statute revision commission - codifies and classifies” laws “in a logical order, but not itself exercising the legislative function.
Summary of this case from Lucio v. StateFull title:Donald TAYLOR, Appellant, v. The STATE of Nevada, Respondent.
Court:Supreme Court of Nevada.
Date published: Sep 18, 2020
The R&R details the deficiencies of Perez-Marquez's complaint and discusses a recent Nevada Supreme Court…
Wrobel v. HardestyThe Nevada Supreme Court recently addressed a similar issue in State v. Taylor, 472 P.3d 195 (Nev. 2020)…