From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sylvester v. Sylvester

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Nov 2, 2009
Civil 09-2544 JMR/FLN (D. Minn. Nov. 2, 2009)

Summary

remarking that “[t]here are several federal laws pertaining to the ‘misuse' of Social Security payments by a ‘representative payee,”' but determining that “those laws provide remedies against representative payees that are enforceable only by the Social Security Administration, and not by individual Social Security beneficiaries who may have been harmed by the misconduct of a representative payee.”

Summary of this case from Moore v. Moore

Opinion

Civil 09-2544 JMR/FLN.

November 2, 2009


ORDER


Based upon the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Recommendation by United States Magistrate Judge Franklin L. Noel dated October 8, 2009, all the files and records, and no objections having been filed to said Report and Recommendation,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis [#2] is DENIED; and
2. This action is summarily DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.


Summaries of

Sylvester v. Sylvester

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Nov 2, 2009
Civil 09-2544 JMR/FLN (D. Minn. Nov. 2, 2009)

remarking that “[t]here are several federal laws pertaining to the ‘misuse' of Social Security payments by a ‘representative payee,”' but determining that “those laws provide remedies against representative payees that are enforceable only by the Social Security Administration, and not by individual Social Security beneficiaries who may have been harmed by the misconduct of a representative payee.”

Summary of this case from Moore v. Moore
Case details for

Sylvester v. Sylvester

Case Details

Full title:David James Sylvester, Plaintiff, v. Mary Christine Sylvester, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Nov 2, 2009

Citations

Civil 09-2544 JMR/FLN (D. Minn. Nov. 2, 2009)

Citing Cases

Stewart L. v. Kijakazi

That said, the claims brought against the remaining defendants are ultimately state-law claims for relief.…

Randall v. Woodson

[11] Our conclusion finds support in the fact that several federal district courts have held that no federal…