From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sykes v. County of Erie

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 30, 2000
94 N.Y.2d 912 (N.Y. 2000)

Summary

affirming summary judgment on ground that plaintiff assumed risk of injury where plaintiff "stepped into a recessed drain near the free throw line while playing basketball on an outdoor court owned by defendant" because "the risks of playing upon an irregular surface are inherent in outdoor basketball activities . . . and . . . the condition of the court was open and obvious."

Summary of this case from Scoma v. U.S.

Opinion

Argued February 15, 2000

Decided March 30, 2000

Charles L. Sawyer, for respondent.

James I. Myers, for appellants.


MEMORANDUM:

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiff injured his knee when he stepped into a recessed drain near the free throw line while playing basketball on an outdoor court owned by defendant. Although the doctrine of assumption of risk does not exculpate a landowner from liability for ordinary negligence in maintaining a premises, there is no evidence that the drain was defective or improperly maintained. In dismissing the complaint, the Appellate Division majority correctly held that the risks of playing upon an irregular surface are inherent in outdoor basketball activities (such as occurred here) and that the condition of the court was open and obvious. Thus, the complaint was properly dismissed on the ground that plaintiff had assumed the risk of the injury (see, Morgan v. New York, 90 N.Y.2d 471; Maddox v. City of New York, 66 N.Y.2d 270; Turcotte v. Fell, 68 N.Y.2d 432).

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum. Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley and Rosenblatt concur.


Summaries of

Sykes v. County of Erie

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 30, 2000
94 N.Y.2d 912 (N.Y. 2000)

affirming summary judgment on ground that plaintiff assumed risk of injury where plaintiff "stepped into a recessed drain near the free throw line while playing basketball on an outdoor court owned by defendant" because "the risks of playing upon an irregular surface are inherent in outdoor basketball activities . . . and . . . the condition of the court was open and obvious."

Summary of this case from Scoma v. U.S.

In Sykes v County of Erie (94 NY2d at 913), where the plaintiff injured his knee when he stepped into a "recessed drain" while playing basketball on an outdoor court, the Court held that "the risks of playing upon an irregular surface are inherent in outdoor basketball activities."

Summary of this case from Palladino v. Lindenhurst Union Free School
Case details for

Sykes v. County of Erie

Case Details

Full title:LESTER SYKES, JR. et al., Appellants, v. COUNTY OF ERIE, Respondent

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 30, 2000

Citations

94 N.Y.2d 912 (N.Y. 2000)
707 N.Y.S.2d 374
728 N.E.2d 973

Citing Cases

Ninivaggi v. Cnty. of Nassau

Pursuant to the doctrine of primary assumption of risk, a voluntary participant in a sporting or…

Palladino v. Lindenhurst Union Free School

The principle of primary assumption of risk extends to those risks associated with the construction of a…