From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Storm v. California

U.S.
Jan 13, 2003
537 U.S. 1127 (2003)

Summary

holding that a two-day break in custody did not preclude an encounter initiated by the police in the absence of counsel because a Miranda request for counsel applies only during continuous custody

Summary of this case from State v. Wessells

Opinion

CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.

No. 02-7344.

January 13, 2003.


Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 28 Cal. 4th 1007, 52 P. 3d 52.


Summaries of

Storm v. California

U.S.
Jan 13, 2003
537 U.S. 1127 (2003)

holding that a two-day break in custody did not preclude an encounter initiated by the police in the absence of counsel because a Miranda request for counsel applies only during continuous custody

Summary of this case from State v. Wessells
Case details for

Storm v. California

Case Details

Full title:STORM v. CALIFORNIA

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jan 13, 2003

Citations

537 U.S. 1127 (2003)

Citing Cases

State v. Wessells

Numerous state courts have articulated a similar approach. See People v. Storm, 28 Cal.4th 1007, 124…