From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stevenson Equipment v. Chemig Construction Corporation

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 30, 1992
79 N.Y.2d 989 (N.Y. 1992)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

upholding jury verdict of fraud when “[t]here is also evidence that defendants were aware that plaintiff was acting on the basis of a mistaken belief ... [t]his situation imposed an obligation to disclose on defendants' part”

Summary of this case from Marini v. Adamo
See 1 Summary

Opinion

Argued April 1, 1992

Decided April 30, 1992

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, Robert R. Meehan, J.

Allen H. Weiss for appellants.

Charles T. Bistany for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division ( 170 A.D.2d 769).

Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges KAYE, TITONE, HANCOCK, JR., and BELLACOSA. Taking no part: Judge SIMONS.

Summaries of

Stevenson Equipment v. Chemig Construction Corporation

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 30, 1992
79 N.Y.2d 989 (N.Y. 1992)

upholding jury verdict of fraud when “[t]here is also evidence that defendants were aware that plaintiff was acting on the basis of a mistaken belief ... [t]his situation imposed an obligation to disclose on defendants' part”

Summary of this case from Marini v. Adamo
Case details for

Stevenson Equipment v. Chemig Construction Corporation

Case Details

Full title:STEVENSON EQUIPMENT, INC., Respondent, v. CHEMIG CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 30, 1992

Citations

79 N.Y.2d 989 (N.Y. 1992)
584 N.Y.S.2d 434
594 N.E.2d 928

Citing Cases

Rose v. American Tobacco Co.

Relying on Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc. ( 505 US 504, supra), the Miele court held that the fraudulent…

Marini v. Adamo

In this case, the testimony overwhelmingly demonstrated that Adamo knew that Marini was relying on his…

23 Citing Cases