holding that suspects must be informed of their right to have an attorney present before and during questioning
Summary of this case from Martelus v. StateNo. SC04-1543, SC04-1550, SC04-1552.
January 5, 2005.
Appeal from the 4th DCA 876 So.2d 614, 884 So.2d 126, 874 So.2d 1225.
Decision without published opinion. Rev. denied.
holding that suspects must be informed of their right to have an attorney present before and during questioning
Summary of this case from Martelus v. StateFull title:STATE v. WEST STATE v. PRESIDENT STATE v. ROBERTS
Court:Supreme Court of Florida
Date published: Jan 5, 2005
In claim one of his original rule 3.850 motion, appellant indicated that the Miranda warnings he received had…
Cook v. StateAfter appellant waived his Miranda rights he provided the detective with a statement. In Roberts v. State,…