From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Sayre

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.
Aug 15, 2017
803 S.E.2d 699 (N.C. Ct. App. 2017)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

In Sayre, Judge Murphy states that he dissents from the majority opinion because the defendant's allegations of materiality under Section 15A-269 entitled him to appointment of counsel.

Summary of this case from State v. Alexander
See 1 Summary

Opinion

No. COA17-68

08-15-2017

STATE of North Carolina v. John H. SAYRE

Attorney General Joshua H. Stein, by Assistant Attorney General Tracy Nayer, for the State. Appellate Defender Glenn Gerding, by Assistant Appellate Defender Nicholas C. Woomer-Deters, for defendant-appellant.

AFFIRMED.

Summaries of

State v. Sayre

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.
Aug 15, 2017
803 S.E.2d 699 (N.C. Ct. App. 2017)

In Sayre, Judge Murphy states that he dissents from the majority opinion because the defendant's allegations of materiality under Section 15A-269 entitled him to appointment of counsel.

Summary of this case from State v. Alexander
Case details for

State v. Sayre

Case Details

Full title:STATE of North Carolina v. John H. SAYRE

Court:Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Date published: Aug 15, 2017

Citations

803 S.E.2d 699 (N.C. Ct. App. 2017)

Citing Cases

State v. Byers

Under our case law, therefore, it would be difficult for even an experienced criminal defense attorney to…

State v. Alexander

In the State's view, defendant's guilty plea deprived him of the ability to make the necessary showing of…

3 Citing Cases