From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Harrell

Supreme Court of Ohio
Oct 21, 1992
65 Ohio St. 3d 37 (Ohio 1992)

Summary

In State ex rel. Jackson v. Allen (1992), 65 Ohio St.3d 37, 599 N.E.2d 696, a criminal defendant filed a motion to dismiss indictments, alleging that the special prosecutor who had obtained the indictments had been improperly appointed.

Summary of this case from State ex Rel. Johnson v. Talikka

Opinion

No. 91-1391

Submitted September 15, 1992 —

Decided October 21, 1992.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 60888.

Stephanie Tubbs Jones, Prosecuting Attorney, George J. Sadd and L. Christopher Frey, Assistant Prosecuting Attorneys, for appellant.


The judgment of the court of appeals suppressing the weapons seized from appellee Harrell's house is reversed on the authority of State v. Perkins (1985), 18 Ohio St.3d 193, 18 OBR 259, 480 N.E.2d 763. The cause is remanded to the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas for an evidentiary hearing on the inevitable discovery exception to the Exclusionary Rule.

MOYER, C.J., SWEENEY, HOLMES, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, H. BROWN and RESNICK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Harrell

Supreme Court of Ohio
Oct 21, 1992
65 Ohio St. 3d 37 (Ohio 1992)

In State ex rel. Jackson v. Allen (1992), 65 Ohio St.3d 37, 599 N.E.2d 696, a criminal defendant filed a motion to dismiss indictments, alleging that the special prosecutor who had obtained the indictments had been improperly appointed.

Summary of this case from State ex Rel. Johnson v. Talikka
Case details for

State v. Harrell

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. HARRELL, APPELLEE

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Oct 21, 1992

Citations

65 Ohio St. 3d 37 (Ohio 1992)
599 N.E.2d 696

Citing Cases

State ex Rel. Johnson v. Talikka

Crim.R. 12(B)(2) provides that defenses and objections based on defects in the indictment, other than failure…

State v. Sincell

See, Ohio Arrest, Search and Seizure (2001) 64, § 2.18, citing State v. Perkins, supra; see also, State v.…