holding the trial court did not erroneously apply the ineffective assistance of counsel standard where the trial court made only a passing reference to the lack of an "impasse," while the majority of the exchange and ruling was centered around the disruption and delay hiring new counsel would cause
Summary of this case from State v. MeltonNo. COA21-496
12-29-2022
STATE of North Carolina v. Charles David HALL, Defendant.
NO ERROR IN PART. NO PLAIN ERROR IN PART.
holding the trial court did not erroneously apply the ineffective assistance of counsel standard where the trial court made only a passing reference to the lack of an "impasse," while the majority of the exchange and ruling was centered around the disruption and delay hiring new counsel would cause
Summary of this case from State v. MeltonFull title:STATE of North Carolina v. Charles David HALL, Defendant.
Court:Court of Appeals of North Carolina.
Date published: Dec 29, 2022
Thus, the trial court did not apply the incorrect standard in considering the motion to withdraw. See also…