Summary
affirming the court of appeals decision because the court was equally divided
Summary of this case from State v. FitzgeraldOpinion
No. 2016AP1276-CR
04-19-2019
STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Nelson GARCIA, Jr., Defendant-Appellant-Petitioner.
For the defendant-appellant-petitioner, there were briefs filed by Pamela Moorshead, assistant state public defender. There was an oral argument by Pamela Moorshead. For the plaintiff-respondent, there was a brief filed by Katherine D. Lloyd, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was Joshua L. Kaul, attorney general. There was an oral argument by Katherine D. Lloyd. An amicus curiae brief was submitted on behalf of The Innocence Project, Inc., and The Wisconsin Innocence Project of the Frank J. Remington Center, University of Wisconsin Law School, by Keith A. Findley and Wisconsin Innocence Project, Madison. With whom on the brief was Alexis Agathocleous and The Innocence Project, Inc., New York, New York.
For the defendant-appellant-petitioner, there were briefs filed by Pamela Moorshead, assistant state public defender. There was an oral argument by Pamela Moorshead.
For the plaintiff-respondent, there was a brief filed by Katherine D. Lloyd, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was Joshua L. Kaul, attorney general. There was an oral argument by Katherine D. Lloyd.
An amicus curiae brief was submitted on behalf of The Innocence Project, Inc., and The Wisconsin Innocence Project of the Frank J. Remington Center, University of Wisconsin Law School, by Keith A. Findley and Wisconsin Innocence Project, Madison. With whom on the brief was Alexis Agathocleous and The Innocence Project, Inc., New York, New York.
Per Curiam.
¶ 1 The decision of the court of appeals is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
¶ 2 SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, J., withdrew from participation.