From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Cook

Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Aug 27, 2013
367 N.C. 212 (N.C. 2013)

Summary

allowing petition for writ of certiorari to review claim that presumptive sentence imposed on remand violated N.C. Gen.Stat. § 15A–1335

Summary of this case from State v. Blackwell

Opinion

No. 59P12–2.

2013-08-27

STATE of North Carolina v. Arthur Junior COOK.

Anne Bleyman, Attorney at Law, for Cook, Arthur Junior. Joseph L. Hyde, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.


Anne Bleyman, Attorney at Law, for Cook, Arthur Junior. Joseph L. Hyde, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.
Peter S. Gilchrist, III, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 9th of April 2013 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A–31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

“Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of August 2013.”


Summaries of

State v. Cook

Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Aug 27, 2013
367 N.C. 212 (N.C. 2013)

allowing petition for writ of certiorari to review claim that presumptive sentence imposed on remand violated N.C. Gen.Stat. § 15A–1335

Summary of this case from State v. Blackwell
Case details for

State v. Cook

Case Details

Full title:STATE of North Carolina v. Arthur Junior COOK.

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Date published: Aug 27, 2013

Citations

367 N.C. 212 (N.C. 2013)
747 S.E.2d 249

Citing Cases

State v. Thomas

Defendant contends that "[t]he sole exception to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1335, and the only circumstance in…

State v. Blackwell

Assuming, arguendo,Defendant did not have a right of appeal, we allow Defendant's petition for writ of…