From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State ex Rel. Desalvo v. May Company

Supreme Court of Ohio
Mar 22, 2000
724 N.E.2d 1147 (Ohio 2000)

Summary

In State ex rel. DeSalvo v. May Co., 88 Ohio St.3d 231 (2000), the court indicated that, where a claimant is capable of working more than four hours per day by combining their abilities to sit, stand and walk, the commission may find that the worker is capable of sustained remunerative employment.

Summary of this case from State ex rel. Bales v. Indus. Comm'n of Ohio

Opinion

No. 99-1339.

Submitted February 8, 2000.

Decided March 22, 2000.

Workers' compensation — Court of appeals' judgment affirmed.

Appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 98AP-986.

Green, Haines, Sgambati, Murphy Macala Co., L.P.A., Ronald E. Slipski and Steven L. Paulson, for appellant.

Reminger Reminger Co., L.P.A., and Francis X. Gardner, for appellee May Co.

Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Dennis L. Hufstader, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio.


The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State ex Rel. Desalvo v. May Company

Supreme Court of Ohio
Mar 22, 2000
724 N.E.2d 1147 (Ohio 2000)

In State ex rel. DeSalvo v. May Co., 88 Ohio St.3d 231 (2000), the court indicated that, where a claimant is capable of working more than four hours per day by combining their abilities to sit, stand and walk, the commission may find that the worker is capable of sustained remunerative employment.

Summary of this case from State ex rel. Bales v. Indus. Comm'n of Ohio
Case details for

State ex Rel. Desalvo v. May Company

Case Details

Full title:The State ex rel. DeSalvo, Appellant, v. May Company, d.b.a. Kaufmann's…

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Mar 22, 2000

Citations

724 N.E.2d 1147 (Ohio 2000)
724 N.E.2d 1147

Citing Cases

State ex rel. Bales v. Indus. Comm'n of Ohio

In State ex rel. Toth v. Indus. Comm., 80 Ohio St.3d 360 (1997), the Supreme Court considered whether or not…

State ex Rel. Moyer v. Sharonville F.D.

{¶ 12} Despite the objections of relator, this court agrees with the magistrate's analysis of the facts and…