From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stanley v. Arnold

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Oct 23, 2012
Case No. 1:12-CV-482 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 23, 2012)

Summary

distinguishing Pfizer on similar grounds

Summary of this case from In re Chemed Corp.

Opinion

Case No. 1:12-CV-482

10-23-2012

HENRY STANLEY, Plaintiff, v. COLLEEN F. ARNOLD, et al., Defendants.


Judge Timothy S. Black


JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

[ ] Jury Verdict: This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been tried and the Jury has rendered its verdict.

[X] Decision by Court: This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried or heard and a decision has been rendered,

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 7) is GRANTED; and the case is CLOSED from the docket of the Court.

JOHN P. HEHMAN, CLERK

By: M. Rogers

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Stanley v. Arnold

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Oct 23, 2012
Case No. 1:12-CV-482 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 23, 2012)

distinguishing Pfizer on similar grounds

Summary of this case from In re Chemed Corp.
Case details for

Stanley v. Arnold

Case Details

Full title:HENRY STANLEY, Plaintiff, v. COLLEEN F. ARNOLD, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Oct 23, 2012

Citations

Case No. 1:12-CV-482 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 23, 2012)

Citing Cases

United States v. Amerisource Bergen Corp.

The few other decisions that reference settlements of claims for civil penalties for violations of Section…

Stanley v. Arnold

Placing undue emphasis on one line in the district court's opinion, Stanley argues that the district court…