holding that by raising outrageous number of issues in 15-page "concise" statements, defendants deliberately circumvented meaning and purpose of Rule 1925(b) and effectively precluded appellate review of issues they sought to raise on appeal
Summary of this case from Bell v. BellNo. 05-553.
January 9, 2006.
Certiorari Denied. (See also No. 05-415, supra.)
Super. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 866 A. 2d 394.
holding that by raising outrageous number of issues in 15-page "concise" statements, defendants deliberately circumvented meaning and purpose of Rule 1925(b) and effectively precluded appellate review of issues they sought to raise on appeal
Summary of this case from Bell v. BellFull title:SPECTOR GADON ROSEN, P. C, ET AL. v. KANTER
Court:U.S.
Date published: Jan 9, 2006
See also Kanter v. Epstein, 866 A.2d 394, 401 (Pa.Super. 2004), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1092, 126 S.Ct.…
Satiro v. Maninno"Even if the trial court correctly guesses the issues Appellant[ ] raise[s] on appeal and writes an opinion…