From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Miller

Supreme Court of North Carolina
May 1, 1911
155 N.C. 247 (N.C. 1911)

Summary

holding there will be a stay of execution as to the parties appealing, upon compliance with this section

Summary of this case from Smith v. Smith

Opinion

(Filed 17 May, 1911.)

1. Appeal and Error — Certiorari — Judgment — Counsel.

A certiorari will not be granted to bring up an appeal to the Supreme Court from final judgment in the lower court on the ground of laches of counsel, except, possibly in an exceptional case.

2. Appeal and Error — Certiorari — Substitute — Interlocutory Order — Former Record — Subsequent Appeal.

A certiorari will not be granted as a substitute for an appeal from an interlocutory judgment. In this case so much of the former record on appeal as is relevant may be used should the applicant for the certiorari appeal from the final judgment.

(248) A. S. Barnard for petitioner.

No counsel contra.


This is a petition for certiorari by C. H. Miller. The facts have been fully stated in an opinion just filed by Mr. Justice Hoke denying Miller's motion to consider his exceptions without the necessity of an appeal. He now asks for a certiorari to bring up his appeal, alleging that he failed to appeal from the final judgment rendered at the December Term below on account of the error of his counsel.

The Court has often held that this would not be ground for a certiorari except possibly under very exceptional circumstances. Barber v. Justice, 138 N.C. 21; Cozart v. Assurance Co., 142 N.C. 524; Harrill v. R. R., 144 N.C. 544. Besides we find upon examination of the judgment at December Term, 1910, below, that it is not a final judgment, but the cause is "retained for further orders," and there is no judgment disposing of the costs or directing payment of them. If the ground for a certiorari were sufficient in other respects, it could not be granted as a substitute for an appeal when the judgment was interlocutory and no appeal lay.

At the next term of the court below the petitioner can move for final judgment in the action, and on his appeal therefrom the exceptions heretofore taken by him will be brought up and reviewed. As it will be expensive, and entirely unnecessary to reprint the voluminous record which was here on the former appeal, on the appeal from the final judgment, the record which was brought here on the former appeal, 151 N.C. 629, and which fully presented the petitioner's exceptions, can be used without reprinting. It will only be necessary in making out the record on the appeal from the final judgment to set out so much of the proceedings since the former appeal as is necessary to present such orders as affect C. H. Miller and other appellants, if there shall be others. And it will be necessary only to print such additional record. (249)

Should there be an appeal from the final judgment there will be a stay of execution as to such of the parties as appeal, upon compliance with the requirements of Revisal, 598.

Certiorari denied.

Cited: S. c., 158 N.C. 98.


Summaries of

Smith v. Miller

Supreme Court of North Carolina
May 1, 1911
155 N.C. 247 (N.C. 1911)

holding there will be a stay of execution as to the parties appealing, upon compliance with this section

Summary of this case from Smith v. Smith
Case details for

Smith v. Miller

Case Details

Full title:E. A. SMITH v. C. H. MILLER

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: May 1, 1911

Citations

155 N.C. 247 (N.C. 1911)
71 S.E. 355

Citing Cases

Smith v. Smith

Had the trial court properly considered plaintiff's motion to stay execution of the judgment and set a bond…

Smith v. Miller

WALKER, J. This case has been before us for adjudication of one question or another several times, and is…