Summary
stating that although "Plaintiff's counsel argues that based on his experience, extensions are 'typically' or 'ordinarily' granted and that Social Security's inefficiency and delay tend to be 'the rule rather than the exception' . . . [t]he Court does not find that extensions are so perfunctorily and 'ordinarily' bestowed"
Summary of this case from Natalizzo v. AstrueOpinion
Case no. 09-14231.
March 17, 2011
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
The Court, pursuant to 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B), and LR 72.1(b)(3), has reviewed Magistrate Judge Michael Hluchaniuk's February 15, 2011 Report and Recommendation, as well as Plaintiff's February 25, 2011 Objection, and upon review of the entire record;
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the report and recommendation is ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of this court.