From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith and Smith

Oregon Court of Appeals
Apr 5, 1991
108 Or. App. 335 (Or. Ct. App. 1991)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

denying modification based on the wife's "substantial income" from property awarded to her in the dissolution and from investments made with cash awarded to her in the dissolution, because such income was "sufficiently foreseeable" at dissolution

Summary of this case from In re Marriage of Williams
See 1 Summary

Opinion

89DMO243; CA A61359

Filed April 5, 1991

Brasch Bauder, North Bend, for motion.

Burch Burnett, P.C., Coquille, contra.

Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Joseph, Chief Judge, and Deits, Judge.

Joseph, C.J., vice Newman, J.

PER CURIAM

Motion allowed; opinion clarified and adhered to as clarified.

PER CURIAM

Husband moves the court for clarification of our opinion, 103 Or. App. 614, 798 P.2d 717 (1990), rev den 311 Or. 87 (1991). We allow the motion. The spousal support modification is effective as of the date of the appellate judgment, February 26, 1991.

Motion allowed; opinion clarified and adhered to as clarified.

Summaries of

Smith and Smith

Oregon Court of Appeals
Apr 5, 1991
108 Or. App. 335 (Or. Ct. App. 1991)

denying modification based on the wife's "substantial income" from property awarded to her in the dissolution and from investments made with cash awarded to her in the dissolution, because such income was "sufficiently foreseeable" at dissolution

Summary of this case from In re Marriage of Williams
Case details for

Smith and Smith

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Marriage of Dane Edward SMITH, Appellant, and…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Apr 5, 1991

Citations

108 Or. App. 335 (Or. Ct. App. 1991)
813 P.2d 1137

Citing Cases

In re Marriage of Williams

See, e.g. , McGinley and McGinley , 172 Or. App. 717, 736-37, 19 P.3d 954, rev. den. , 332 Or. 305, 27 P.3d…

1 Citing Cases