holding that the prime rate is the appropriate rate for calculating interest on a plaintiff's award for pain and suffering
Summary of this case from In re Cambridge Capital Group, Inc.No. 96-554.
December 9, 1996, OCTOBER TERM, 1996.
C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 88 F. 3d 780.
holding that the prime rate is the appropriate rate for calculating interest on a plaintiff's award for pain and suffering
Summary of this case from In re Cambridge Capital Group, Inc.holding that town's enforcement of flood plain restriction did not constitute compensable taking of plaintiff's property given that she had failed to demonstrate that she had reasonable investment-backed expectation that she could subdivide property where she purchased the property subject to restrictions on building in flood plain; economic impact was not so severe where land remained suitable for original agricultural purposes; and permit process amounted to physical invasion by government
Summary of this case from Lopes v. City of PeabodyFinding that the arbitration clause in the agreement at issue could only be enforced against the signatories to that agreement.
Summary of this case from In re NBR Antitrust Litigationfinding no change in controlling facts from one tax year to another
Summary of this case from Harrington Haley LLP v. Nutmeg Insuranceaffirming city's abatement of nuisance posed by trash and debris on private property to protect health and safety of public
Summary of this case from City of Carmel v. Martin Marietta Materialsenforcing an arbitration clause even if a party may have to "litigate its claims in three different fora with three different sets of rules"
Summary of this case from Fitzgerald v. HRB Management Inc.Full title:SMILECARE DENTAL GROUP v. DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIFORNIA, Inc
Court:U.S.
Date published: Dec 9, 1996
On respondents' appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, that court affirmed the finding of…
Blair v. Department of Conservation and RecreationThus, courts consider (1) " the economic impact of the regulation on the claimant" ; (2) " the extent to…