Summary
approving the VE's use of OEQ job incidence data where he was able to offer numbers for DOT-specific jobs based on his education, training, and experience; his knowledge that one of the subject DOT jobs was the "predominant job among three listed within [the broader OEQ code]"; and his personal observation of the number of job openings listed in the newspaper for a particular DOT job
Summary of this case from Boston v. ColvinOpinion
No. 1:12-cv-236-GZS
05-08-2013
ROLLIN SMALL, Plaintiff v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, ACTING COMMSSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant
ORDER AFFIRMING THE
RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on March 30, 2013, his Recommended Decision (ECF No. 22). Plaintiff filed his Objection to the Recommended Decision (ECF No. 23) on April 16, 2013. The Government filed its Response to Plaintiff's Objection to the Recommended Decision (ECF No. 24) on May 3, 2013.
I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary.
1. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED.
2. It is ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner is hereby AFFIRMED.
George Z. Singal
United States District Judge