Summary
In Sheridan v. Andrews (80 N.Y. 648) it was said: "In this case we are not able to find the power in the General Term to vacate on motion the judgments of the Special and General Terms, after both have been affirmed by this court. * * * We will not say that in no case can judgments of Special Term and General Term, after affirmance by this court, be modified on motion in the court of original jurisdiction.
Summary of this case from Hewitt v. BallardOpinion
Argued March 9, 1880
Decided March 19, 1880
Joseph S. Ridgway for appellants.
Thomas M. Wheeler for respondent.
Per Curiam opinion for reversal of order as to appellant, without costs.
All concur, except MILLER, J., not voting, and ANDREWS, J., absent.
Order reversed.