From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

S.H. v. Bd. of Educ. of the Twp. of Alloway

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
May 4, 2023
253 N.J. 553 (N.J. 2023)

Summary

reversing the decision not to issue an FRO under the PDVA and remanding for entry of the FRO because the record contained "ample evidence" that the plaintiff needed the FRO to prevent further abuse

Summary of this case from C.R. v. M.T.

Opinion

C-601 September Term 2022 087408.

05-04-2023

S.H. and C.H., on behalf of their minor children, C.H., S.H., and S.H., Petitioners-Petitioners, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF the TOWNSHIP OF ALLOWAY, SALEM COUNTY, Respondent-Respondent.


ORDER

A petition for certification of the judgment in A-003863-18 having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;

It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is denied, with costs.


Summaries of

S.H. v. Bd. of Educ. of the Twp. of Alloway

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
May 4, 2023
253 N.J. 553 (N.J. 2023)

reversing the decision not to issue an FRO under the PDVA and remanding for entry of the FRO because the record contained "ample evidence" that the plaintiff needed the FRO to prevent further abuse

Summary of this case from C.R. v. M.T.
Case details for

S.H. v. Bd. of Educ. of the Twp. of Alloway

Case Details

Full title:S.H. and C.H., on behalf of their minor children, C.H., S.H., and S.H.…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Date published: May 4, 2023

Citations

253 N.J. 553 (N.J. 2023)
292 A.3d 832

Citing Cases

C.R. v. M.T.

Similarly, even if the first FPO judge did not make a finding on factor two of SASPA, had the record…