From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scott v. Vasquez

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California, Western Division
Dec 11, 2009
CV 02-05296 GAF (AJW) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 11, 2009)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

finding five-year delay was prejudicial because it increased the likelihood witness memories would be diminished

Summary of this case from Lopes-Salas v. Parson
See 2 Summaries

Opinion

FLOYD D. SCOTT, Plaintiff, v. M. VASQUEZ, et al., Defendants. No. CV 02-05296 GAF (AJW) United States District Court, C.D. California, Western Division. December 11, 2009

          ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          GARY A. FEESS, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has reviewed the entire record in this action, the attached Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge ("Report") and the objections thereto, and the Supplemental Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge ("Supplemental Report"). Good cause appearing, the Court concurs with and adopts the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations contained in the Report and the Supplemental Report after having made a de novo determination of the portions of the Report to which objections were directed.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.

Summaries of

Scott v. Vasquez

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California, Western Division
Dec 11, 2009
CV 02-05296 GAF (AJW) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 11, 2009)

finding five-year delay was prejudicial because it increased the likelihood witness memories would be diminished

Summary of this case from Lopes-Salas v. Parson

In Scott, the magistrate judge recommended the dismissal of plaintiff's claims against a deceased defendant where plaintiff had not filed a motion for substitution after defense counsel filed a suggestion of death.

Summary of this case from McNeal v. Evert
Case details for

Scott v. Vasquez

Case Details

Full title:FLOYD D. SCOTT, Plaintiff, v. M. VASQUEZ, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California, Western Division

Date published: Dec 11, 2009

Citations

CV 02-05296 GAF (AJW) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 11, 2009)

Citing Cases

Zanowick v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.

See, e.g., Fair v. I.R.S., No. 3:12-CV-1714-AC, 2014 WL 458568, at *1 (D. Or. Feb. 4, 2014) ; McCree v. Cal.…

Zanowick v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.

See, e.g., Fair v. I.R.S., No. 3:12-CV-1714-AC, 2014 WL 458568, at *1 (D. Or. Feb. 4, 2014); McCree v. Cal.…

7 Citing Cases