From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scott v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jan 12, 2000
748 So. 2d 366 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

affirming denial of Rule 3.850 motion

Summary of this case from Scott v. State
See 1 Summary

Opinion

No. 3D99-312.

Opinion filed January 12, 2000. Rehearing Denied February 9, 2000.

An Appeal under Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(i) from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Maxine Cohen Lando, Judge, L.T. No. 94-38169A.

Vrian Scott, in proper person.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Regine Monestime, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before JORGENSON, GERSTEN, and SHEVIN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984).

Summaries of

Scott v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jan 12, 2000
748 So. 2d 366 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

affirming denial of Rule 3.850 motion

Summary of this case from Scott v. State
Case details for

Scott v. State

Case Details

Full title:VRIAN SCOTT, Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jan 12, 2000

Citations

748 So. 2d 366 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Citing Cases

Scott v. State

We therefore find no merit to this postconviction motion. See Scott v. State, No. 3D08-1437, 2008 WL 4542450…

1 Citing Cases