holding that the mere fact that a supervisor kept track of plaintiff's arrival times does not constitute adverse employment action

finding no violation stemming from twenty-three-hour lockdown with meals in cells, limited vocational, educational, and recreational services, and exercise of one hour per day in cell

affirming summary judgment as to conditions-of-confinement claim where plaintiff failed to plead culpable state of mind, and record indicated that prison officials sought to remedy condition complained of

In Tolbert, the ALJ found a claimant's testimony regarding pain not credible. The Tenth Circuit reversed, noting that the ALJ's "findings made no reference to [the consulting physician's] diagnosis of somatoform pain disorder."

explaining that personal injury actions arising from incidents on federal enclaves may support federal jurisdiction, and that, under 16 U.S.C. § 457, now 28 U.S.C. § 5001, personal injuries sustained within a federal enclave are governed by the state law of the state within which the federal enclave is situated

noting that a prisoner's assignment to administrative segregation at CSP did not provide him with a procedural due process claim

requiring inmates to eat meals in cells that they must clean themselves with a minimal amount of cleaning supplies does not present an excessive risk to inmate health or safety

preventing inmate from attending service for six weeks did not substantially burden religious practice under RFRA

noting that the plaintiff should have been aware that she could have asserted her rights earlier because the earlier alleged incidents were more serious in nature than the later incidents

noting that the plaintiff should have been aware that she could have asserted her rights earlier because the earlier alleged incidents were more serious in nature than the later incidents