From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sargeant v. Grimes

U.S.
Oct 8, 1934
293 U.S. 568 (1934)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

recognizing the receiver's need to be able to conform to the terms of an existing contract experimentally while deciding whether the contract should be rejected or affirmed

Summary of this case from Loc. Joint Executive Bd., Etc. v. Hotel Circle
See 1 Summary

Opinion

No. 105.

October 8, 1934, OCTOBER TERM, 1934.

Mr. Frederick E.Dickerson for petitioner.

Mr. Max P. Zoll for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied. Reported below: 70 F. (2d) 121.

Summaries of

Sargeant v. Grimes

U.S.
Oct 8, 1934
293 U.S. 568 (1934)

recognizing the receiver's need to be able to conform to the terms of an existing contract experimentally while deciding whether the contract should be rejected or affirmed

Summary of this case from Loc. Joint Executive Bd., Etc. v. Hotel Circle
Case details for

Sargeant v. Grimes

Case Details

Full title:SARGEANT v. GRIMES

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 8, 1934

Citations

293 U.S. 568 (1934)

Citing Cases

Wilentz v. Hendrickson

1931 to 1936. It would be interesting but altogether too long to detail the various unsuccessful appeals that…

Vesey v. Driscoll

The view we take of this case is that we are not concerned with the reasoning or statements set down in the…

21 Citing Cases